The SAAF Forum

Discussion on the SAAF and other southern African air forces.
It is currently 20 Jun 2013, 11:31

All times are UTC + 2 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 201 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 10 Nov 2011, 00:43 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 02 Jun 2006, 20:05
Posts: 440
Location: 44.634171°, -93.129741°
Its a beast!
Image

_________________
In God I trust, everyone else bring your data!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 10 Nov 2011, 04:13 
Offline

Joined: 17 Jun 2011, 17:07
Posts: 91
Some more
Image

Image
Both with the YJ-83


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Nov 2011, 00:51 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 02 Jun 2006, 20:05
Posts: 440
Location: 44.634171°, -93.129741°
The LT-3 and the LT-2 are new when seen next to the FC-1. These add to the GB-1 and the LS-6, on the FC-1's list of precision bombs

Image

Image

Image

_________________
In God I trust, everyone else bring your data!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Nov 2011, 15:22 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 02 Jun 2006, 20:05
Posts: 440
Location: 44.634171°, -93.129741°
A PAF JF-17 crashed killing the driver, Mohammed Hussain . I met and spoke to the guy at Farnborough last year. RIP

Image

Image

Image

_________________
In God I trust, everyone else bring your data!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Nov 2011, 15:47 
Offline

Joined: 26 Feb 2009, 11:40
Posts: 849
Location: Waterfalls , Harare south
pngwerume wrote:
A PAF JF-17 crashed killing the driver, Mohammed Hussain . I met and spoke to the guy at Farnborough last year. RIP


How are you doing ?

_________________
"My dream is that somehow South Africans and Zimbabweans create relationships of such a nature that the Limpopo river is no longer a border, but is a source of water and food.” -Bishop Paul Verryn
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueEbv02k7Ag


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Nov 2011, 16:25 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 02 Jun 2006, 20:05
Posts: 440
Location: 44.634171°, -93.129741°
I am fine Sky. Thanks.

The pilot was found 2 -3km from crash site. Seem he ejected and the chute failed to deploy. MB seat.

_________________
In God I trust, everyone else bring your data!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Nov 2011, 21:44 
Offline

Joined: 07 Apr 2008, 11:50
Posts: 2412
It seems to me that the folks at Martin-Baker have some explaining to do. [-X
Failures of their products have made the news a little bit too often lately. :cry:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Nov 2011, 23:39 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 02 Jun 2006, 20:05
Posts: 440
Location: 44.634171°, -93.129741°
True - MB have some problems. It seems more so with the RAF incident because it seems to have been the cause.
With the PAF JF-17, the MB system failed to mitigate the consequences but at the moment rumours are it was a birdstrike/ingestion leading to an engine fire or flameout. Sqdrn Leader Hussain was trying to get to base but the plane hit the hillside a few kilometers away.

_________________
In God I trust, everyone else bring your data!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Nov 2011, 09:56 
Offline

Joined: 26 Feb 2009, 11:40
Posts: 849
Location: Waterfalls , Harare south
Roger the Dodger wrote:
It seems to me that the folks at Martin-Baker have some explaining to do. [-X
Failures of their products have made the news a little bit too often lately. :cry:


ejection seats and their chutes scare the shit out of me. it seems the pilot has a 49.5% chance of reaching the ground alive

_________________
"My dream is that somehow South Africans and Zimbabweans create relationships of such a nature that the Limpopo river is no longer a border, but is a source of water and food.” -Bishop Paul Verryn
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueEbv02k7Ag


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Nov 2011, 10:30 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 03 May 2005, 08:40
Posts: 2693
Location: Whangarei, New Zealand
Those are still far better odds than remaining with the stricken aircraft ;)

_________________
A plan is simply a basis for change.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Nov 2011, 10:32 
Offline

Joined: 26 Feb 2009, 11:40
Posts: 849
Location: Waterfalls , Harare south
chances of reaching the ground unscratched are next to none :cry:

_________________
"My dream is that somehow South Africans and Zimbabweans create relationships of such a nature that the Limpopo river is no longer a border, but is a source of water and food.” -Bishop Paul Verryn
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueEbv02k7Ag


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Nov 2011, 12:01 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 02 Jun 2006, 20:05
Posts: 440
Location: 44.634171°, -93.129741°
skyhawk77 wrote:
chances of reaching the ground unscratched are next to none :cry:


From: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m ... ntent;col1


Quote:
The overall ACES II ejection survival rate from Aug 1978 to Sep 2000 was 92 percent (see Table 1). During this period, a total of 362 ejections occurred in five different types of ACES II seat-equipped aircraft.

Ejecting is the lesser of the two evils by far. If you die after you eject, you have changed nothing, you have not made your situation any worse since on the plane you have 0% chance of survival and 100% chance of dying. However, there are very good chances, 92% if you consider the USAF data that you will survive if you eject. The ejection seat takes your chance of being alive in the next 10 seconds from 0% to 92%.

_________________
In God I trust, everyone else bring your data!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Nov 2011, 01:25 
Offline

Joined: 12 Nov 2011, 13:36
Posts: 6
Seems as if the ejection seat worked fine but the chute did not deploy. So it was a problem with the chute.

Also cracks have been reported on JF-17 wing roots.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Apr 2012, 08:35 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 02 Jun 2006, 20:05
Posts: 440
Location: 44.634171°, -93.129741°
Fuller image here: http://i.imgur.com/Pla7c.jpg

Image

Kanwa had an interview with PAF's General Javaid Ahmed, during which he stated that:
- In 2012, they will be bring out the JF17 Blk 2. The main improvements are the addition of IRF, the development of a twin seat version, adding datalink and development of an export version JF17.
- happy with the performance of the KJL7, so no immediate plans to switch to AESA (KJL7 specs: detection range for fighter sized target 130km; can track 16 targets and engage 2 at the same time; have SAR mapping capability)
- The Chinese indigenous engine is currently undergoing flight testing and may be a while before it is fitted to a JF17
- In 2011 the JF17 test fired: 1 x C802 (hit a seaborne target 90km away, max range 180km); 2 x LS-6 bombs, one is a 500kg GPS guided weapon with 60km range and CEP of 15m, the other was a 250kg laser/IIR+GPS guided weapon with a range of 65km and CEP of 5.3-7.5m; SD10 and other weapons.

_________________
In God I trust, everyone else bring your data!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Apr 2012, 08:50 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 02 Jun 2006, 20:05
Posts: 440
Location: 44.634171°, -93.129741°
These are from yesterday. No clue what it is carrying.

Image

Image

_________________
In God I trust, everyone else bring your data!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 201 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next

All times are UTC + 2 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group