Monique wrote:
Oh dear, no, not you either! The other other fella from NZ
It is an interesting hypothesis that you propose, Monique. The "other fella from NZ" proposes that the hypothesis is false, albeit in a somewhat unscientific, more standard, language.
But, then he goes on and actually proposes what should be viewed as a very logical step, and that is to do proper research on your hypothesis. However, the proposed method should be more properly thought out and formulated by considering things like confidence levels, universes, sampling methods, sample sizes based on proper statistical requirements, etc. His/her proposal for sampling method, for instance will lead to a self selected sample which is, for the purpose of a scientific study, not reliable enough. Furthermore, his research proposal also lacks proper theory and literature studies with at least forty current references from respected, peer reviewed international (nogal) journals. If he could just correct these little nigling concerns, we may just have a thesis in the making which may lead to some interesting conclusions and recommendations
My hypothesis, on the other hand, is that the "other fella from NZ" supports a lousy rugby team in South Africa.
(Anybody interested in researching my hypothesis?). If he was a BlueBullSuporter, then he would have had my vote and support all the way
By the way, this is just a tongue-in-cheek comment on this topic.