The SAAF Forum

Discussion on the SAAF and other southern African air forces.
It is currently 24 May 2013, 23:41

All times are UTC + 2 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 85 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 13 May 2012, 22:36 
Offline

Joined: 10 May 2012, 13:48
Posts: 25
Thanks to all for organising an opportunity to hear the Griffons growl!

Here are some of my favourites:
Image
One can almost see the laughter on her face!

Image
After the bath


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012, 00:52 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2011, 23:59
Posts: 3241
Location: 34º 05' 54" S 18º 22' 49"E
The Death of Pelican 16 DVD refers: While searching the web to find out where a copy could be obtained in the UK I came across this quote which I think sums it up very well:
Quote:
I know an ex-RAF Shackleton signaller who, when he saw this video, could actually smell the inside of a well-used Shack.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012, 07:51 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2010, 19:54
Posts: 212
It was really great to hear that wonderful sound again. I couldn't help but laugh when the prefab building lifted off the ground, when the Shack was throttled up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012, 07:59 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2004, 17:19
Posts: 4236
And she only went to a maximum of 60% power!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012, 08:01 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2010, 19:54
Posts: 212
Dean wrote:
And she only went to a maximum of 60% power!

:shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012, 12:42 
Offline

Joined: 07 Apr 2008, 11:50
Posts: 2357
There seems to be a significant 'nose down' tilt of the outboard engines. Is it real or just an illusion due to the camera angle?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012, 13:30 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 09 Feb 2008, 16:47
Posts: 1213
Location: Somerset West, South Africa
Roger the Dodger wrote:
There seems to be a significant 'nose down' tilt of the outboard engines. Is it real or just an illusion due to the camera angle?


Never noticed that. The starboard, outboard engine does seem to have a bit of a nose-down tilt. It might just look like that because of the position of the props?

_________________
[Sardine]
My Photos: http://www.airplane-pictures.net/member ... .php?p=882
Blog: http://the-flying-fish.blogspot.com/, UPDATED on 13 September 2012


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012, 16:27 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 02 May 2012, 20:21
Posts: 342
Location: Cape Town
If this Shack can't fly, why can C-47s?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012, 16:37 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2011, 23:59
Posts: 3241
Location: 34º 05' 54" S 18º 22' 49"E
nathan.howson wrote:
If this Shack can't fly, why can C-47s?


Built in a tougher time. I recall reading somewhere, possibly erroneous, that a Dak basically has no limiting airframe life. "On and on she flies, she never dies".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012, 16:40 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2011, 23:59
Posts: 3241
Location: 34º 05' 54" S 18º 22' 49"E
Gripen wrote:
Roger the Dodger wrote:
There seems to be a significant 'nose down' tilt of the outboard engines. Is it real or just an illusion due to the camera angle?


Never noticed that. The starboard, outboard engine does seem to have a bit of a nose-down tilt. It might just look like that because of the position of the props?


Pored through some technical drawings of the Mk3 - nothing there indicative of a droop on the outer engine nacelles although this may not be obvious from the specs. I suggest someone take a ladder and a tape measure to Ysterplaat and check? It may be that the flex of the outer wing panels in flight require an initial droop? Interesting to know. Would Pottie know?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012, 16:53 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2004, 17:19
Posts: 4236
MikeHotel wrote:
Hi Eugene, I read somewhere - either on this forum or on the VleisBroek page - cannon removed as she would not be able to fit into Hangar 4. DeanW can probably confirm this.


I asisted Pottie and his small team to put 1722 to bed this morning, as can be seen, it is a tight squeeze, less than a foot at either end. :shock:

Image

Image

Image

Image

I also took a video of her being pulled into the hangar if anyone is interested.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012, 17:10 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2011, 23:59
Posts: 3241
Location: 34º 05' 54" S 18º 22' 49"E
Dean wrote:
I asisted Pottie and his small team to put 1722 to bed this morning, as can be seen, it is a tight squeeze, less than a foot at either end.


Call me old fashioned, recidivist and verkramp but a Shack without the cannon somehow looks - well, emasculated? I suppose. Making the hangar bigger was out of the question? (That's a joke - but I don't do smilies - outgrew emoticons in the nineties).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012, 20:28 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2007, 16:57
Posts: 4091
Location: ILS RWY19, FACT
Ok Dean .. fess up .. :?: :?:

I know you're not this tall !!! :lol: :lol: :?: :?:

Image

_________________
Brent Best


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 May 2012, 21:25 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2011, 23:59
Posts: 3241
Location: 34º 05' 54" S 18º 22' 49"E
Kremlin wrote:
Ok Dean .. fess up .. :?: :?:

I know you're not this tall !!! :lol: :lol: :?: :?:



He was on tiptoes, of course!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 May 2012, 09:21 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2004, 17:19
Posts: 4236
Herewith a short video, very poor sound quality and I make no excuses!



Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 85 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 2 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group