The SAAF Forum

Discussion on the SAAF and other southern African air forces.
It is currently 14 May 2024, 03:46

All times are UTC + 2 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 08 Jun 2009, 21:24 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 05 Apr 2008, 13:48
Posts: 228
Hmmm, skyhawk, you say we don’t take any negative feed back on the gripen, yet the only person you have complemented in this whole thread is koffiepit, who said good things about the J-10, while people like W407594F and oryx gave very good points, yet they were not in your favour and so they don’t fall under your spectrum of people who should be on the forum. Also you say wolfman is not taking any bad news about the gripen, yet in his response to rynopot he clearly wasn’t in favour of the gripen, where as, when have you ever responded negatively about the J-10

Quote:
wolfman you are a wolf for sure
Great play on words there, wish I had your talent with the English language.

Anyway back to topic. What W407594F said about the data link is quite true. One thing I have picked up about the gripens is it looks like the more there are of them the stronger they all get. The fact that one can stand off at a distance and mask the other forward gripens from the enemy, while tracking the enemy at the same time and passing that info onto the forward gripens missiles gives it a huge advantage.

Quote:
if there is a greater than 95% chance thata bullet will strike the radar target at any given moment; the computer fires the gun automatically.

Does that include while the gripen is trying to get a missile lock while engaged or is it only once you have either first fired the canon yourself so that the aircraft can pick up that you are now in a gun fight (per say). I am sure there must be some way to activate it and de activate it, otherwise it could be a real problem while escorting a plane to land, you might shoot it down while never even intending to do so if the computer decides it has the perfect chance to get a shot in:?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 08 Jun 2009, 21:59 
Offline

Joined: 19 Oct 2005, 12:39
Posts: 1372
Location: United Kingdom
The Friend or Foe transmitter I think will/should sort out who/what the computor targets and avoid having a blue on blue incident.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 09 Jun 2009, 08:19 
Offline

Joined: 25 Apr 2009, 20:03
Posts: 126
pngwerume wrote:
Apparently,"... ... the really cool thing about the Gripen in a dogfight is its gun, the onboard computer takes over to fly the plane and aim the gun. Not exactly proven in combat yet, but seem to work wonders on drones. ...


Correct me if I'm wrong, the computer takes care of the a/c attitude and speed aswell as the G-loading, so if say the Gripen is in a high speed knife fight with a very manoeuvrable opponent, the poor Gripen pilot might blackout due to g-loc and still have a kill. \:D/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 09 Jun 2009, 08:49 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 23 Jul 2004, 15:11
Posts: 961
Location: Centurion, RSA
Yes, Wolfman
Theoretically that might be true, but remember, the aircraft parameters limit G-load to 9g. Most pilots are trained to withstand that, now-a-days, as most aircraft are limited to that. They do it with the help of their modern g-suites of course. I’m sure the flight control will stray with-in the flight parameters....

_________________
Da-di-da-da-da


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 09 Jun 2009, 09:38 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 02 Jun 2006, 20:05
Posts: 453
Location: 44.634171°, -93.129741°
Was reading on F16.net and they were comparing the Gripen to the Falcon/Viper. While I am sure by the time the Gripen is forced into a cannon fight it iwll be out of missiles and will have jetisoned external fuel tanks, they were saying when loaded - the Gripen is limite to 5-6G.

_________________
In God I trust, everyone else bring your data!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 09 Jun 2009, 09:48 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 02 Jun 2006, 20:05
Posts: 453
Location: 44.634171°, -93.129741°
W407594F wrote:
I am more interested in WWII aircraft, statergy and tactics used than in modern individual aircraft performance.

So please correct me here.

An aircraft using its own radar gives its position away to the enemies passive counter measures. So unless backed up with a missile like the old Phoenix this radar reach can also be an own goal.

Or

I take it that one Gripen could light up its radar and data link to the others that have not and are a distance away, giving them the enemies postion etc. Which is basically what an AWACS does for the USAAF & NATO aircraft.

So does this J-10 have a data link as good as the JAS-39 #-o


Yes, by switching on its radar, a plane is also advertising it presence.

Concerning data link - I would bet the Gripen has the more advanced one. However, reading from another source (more that just a forum) - the expert view was that with the Gripen system having been advertised for the past decade or more - any fighter being launched these days should/is expected and is very likely to have a fighter-tofighter data link that mimics the Gripen one.

The FC-1 has a "basic" (???) data link and said to have F-16 Block 52 avionics. With the J-10 meant to be a class above the FC-1, it should have a respectable datalink. A dome loke antena behind the J-10 cockpit is said to be for the data link.


The Pentagon’s annual report on the Chinese military from about a year ago touched on the J-10. They were commenting on how it has evolved from being a Gripen, F-16 etc competitor to approach the Eurofighters and Rafales. I took that with a grain of salt but looking at how the FC-1 has turned out to be, I can expect a lot more from the J-10.

Also I was reading an interview with an Pakistan official and they were being asked about their F-16 C/D having to face-off with Indian MKIs. His reply was something like “the J-10 will cover for some of the F-16 limitations”. He put the J-10 ahead of their F-16 Block 50/52s.

INTERVIEW WITH CAS ACM TANVIR MAHMOOD AHMAD in October 2006
Quote:
Q. How can you compare F-16 and Su-30?

Ans. These aircraft can be compared in many ways. Su-30 MKI has powerful radar but it can be detected by the AEW&C systems and the F-16s will thus be aware of its presence. Apart from that both aircraft can carry latest weapon systems. Su-30 MKI has the capacity to carry heavy loads and more fuel but this can be countered with the help of AAR. In the same manner Chinese F-10A is also an excellent platform in countering this threat and can carry heavier loads than the F-16.

_________________
In God I trust, everyone else bring your data!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 09 Jun 2009, 11:37 
Offline

Joined: 25 Apr 2009, 20:03
Posts: 126
boertjie wrote:
Yes, Wolfman
Theoretically that might be true, but remember, the aircraft parameters limit G-load to 9g. Most pilots are trained to withstand that, now-a-days, as most aircraft are limited to that. They do it with the help of their modern g-suites of course. I’m sure the flight control will stray with-in the flight parameters....


9g's is alot of force on the body, easy capable of blacking out a pilot with a G-suit. I heard from experienced pilots that have combat experience that 9g's in a centrifuge is very different to 9g's in a combat situation with a stressed pilot, were the pilot is using alot more oxygen then in normal situations, which puts more stress on the pilots body making a blackout very possible even on the best pilot with a G-suit, and remember every pilot has different tolerances.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 09 Jun 2009, 11:57 
Offline

Joined: 26 Aug 2005, 09:49
Posts: 204
Wolfman wrote:
9g's is alot of force on the body, easy capable of blacking out a pilot with a G-suit. I heard from experienced pilots that have combat experience that 9g's in a centrifuge is very different to 9g's in a combat situation with a stressed pilot, were the pilot is using alot more oxygen then in normal situations, which puts more stress on the pilots body making a blackout very possible even on the best pilot with a G-suit, and remember every pilot has different tolerances.


All very true. It is also important to note that there are G-suits and then there are G-suits. A lot of research had been done on the way in which a G-suit inflates during the G-onset process, and where it should be providing pressure, as well as the influence of pilot body position, fitness, etc. In the case of Gripen all the pilots have to go to Sweden for testing in their centrifuge before being allowed to fly Gripen to 9G. The centrifuge does not only have the ability to load a pilot up to 9G, but it can generate very fast G-onset rates and they even have a simulator in the centrifuge on which you can perform tasks while at high G. The system was used extensively during the HMD development. I understand South Africa is now in the process of acquiring a similar system so the pilots can be tested at home.

The G-suit on the Gripen is, by all accounts, very effective when compared to older systems and a lot of research had gone into developing the system. I know of several test pilots who have sustained 9G for considerable periods of time in Gripen while in tight descending turns - although they complain of pretty bruised bodies afterwards. That is not to say that other modern aircraft (F-22, Eurofighter, Rafale, F-35, etc.) don't also have excellent systems. In fact, the Germans are now using the Libelle G-suit system in the Eurofighter, which uses liquid rather than air as the medium that provides the pressure. I had a long discussion with one of the Eurofighter test pilots who did quite a bit of testing with the Libelle suit, and he could not stop singing its praises. He claims that in the centrifuge he was still able to talk fairly comfortably at 10G, while in the actual aircraft he said that he was much more comfortable going to max G while wearing the Libelle suit. So much so, that there are even some concerns that the fatigue life of Eurofighter might be shortened due to the willingness of the pilots to go to maximum G while wearing the new suit...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 09 Jun 2009, 12:54 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2009, 11:40
Posts: 1057
Location: Waterfalls , Harare south
grizzly grizzly grizzly you should get used to the idea that i m not a fan of the gripen and i will lock it at every opportunity i get objectively of course. i dont loathe the gripen as you make it seem i like it as much as wolfman does ,like the iris-t missles very advance there to make the pilot feel better because he has no gun. did you know there can also be put on the j-10 and the reverse is impossible. i like the cockpit too very advanced though the radar is weaker when compared to the j-10 and of course the view the pilot has. a lady on this forum sent me a pvt message saying it can be rearmed whilst in the air i didnt know about that.
wolfman can you listen to me for a moment. i think ceiling is of paramount importance. with a ceiling of 50000ft thats not enough to gurantee you that you are going to fly above all kinds of weather so in worst cases you forced to find your way around thereby losing the precious fuel . also ceiling is important when you are chasing high flying fighters like the j-10 its better to be more or less on the same level than look up i m not sure if the beloved gripen has a look up look down radar. pngwerume i cldnt help grinning when you said the j-10 is more of in the rafales, ef league i call it the dragon grin

_________________
I have always believed if done right , armed robbery doesn't have to be a totally unpleasant experience- Brad Pitt as J.D in Thelma and Louise


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 09 Jun 2009, 14:32 
Offline

Joined: 25 Apr 2009, 20:03
Posts: 126
skyhawk77 wrote:
wolfman can you listen to me for a moment. i think ceiling is of paramount importance. with a ceiling of 50000ft thats not enough to gurantee you that you are going to fly above all kinds of weather so in worst cases you forced to find your way around thereby losing the precious fuel.


Sorry to burst your bubble, but most weather occurs in the Troposphere which is at an average height of 36,090 ft because of the higher concentration of water vapour and condensation nuclei, and weather rarely occurs in the Stratosphere due to the Tropopause acting as a barrier. One problem at high altitude is CAT which is normally associated with jet streams.

skyhawk77 wrote:
also ceiling is important when you are chasing high flying fighters like the j-10 its better to be more or less on the same level than look up i m not sure if the beloved gripen has a look up look down radar.


Sourced from Janes

Quote:
The Mk 4 will involve both new software and hardware, the last primarily involving extra signal processing and high-frequency signal generation capacity.

It will replace the current Mk 3 configuration of the PS-05/A, that became available in 2005, along with the E18 edition of the Gripen operational flight programme (OFP) software. (Sweden now has the E18:9 version of the OFP, the Czech Republic E18:7 and Hungary E18:3).

The Mk 3, equipped with a new signal/data processor based on Mercury processor technology, already features certain SAR/GMTI/ GMTT capabilities as well as air-to-ground ranging and sea surface modes. For air-to-air, the Mk 3 has "full look-up look-down capability" plus multi-target track-while-scan, PTT and STT, short-range auto-acquisition and tracking and a beyond visual range (BVR) missile datalink capability for Raytheon AIM-120B (added as part of the E15 software in 2003) and MBDA Meteor air-to-air missiles. The radar targeting modes are also integrated with the Gripen's intra-flight datalink so that radar tracks are automatically shared with the other JAS 39 aircraft in the flight.

By 2008, an interim air-to-ground update is to be fielded as part of the new E19 software release. (The first Gripen to use E19 is actually the first South African aircraft, which already has E19 fitted and was shipped from Saab to South Africa on 16 June 2006). The interim radar update is aimed at better preparing the JAS 39C/D for providing air support to the Swedish-led Nordic Battlegroup - a 2,000-strong rapid reaction force to be on standby for a crisis response operation under the EU flag during the first half of 2008.

The Mk 4, which Branzell described as a "big step in the continued development of the PS-05/A", will be introduced as part of the next E20 software edition. The contract currently under negotiation is, for the time being, "just for the SwAF Gripen fleet" (how many aircraft will receive the upgrade package has yet to be decided) and not for the international Gripen users. "The Mk 4 radar is not in their current contracts; if the Czechs, Hungarians or South Africans want it their contracts will need to be modified," a senior Ericsson Microwave Systems executive told Jane's.

According to the company's future fighter radar roadmap, the Mk 4 is to be further upgraded to Mk 5 standard by 2012, when an active electronically scanned array (AESA) antenna (for which a source of transmit/receive modules has yet to be identified, with European and US alternatives being considered) is to replace the current mechanically scanned antenna.

"Our objective is to place the AESA antenna in front of the Mk 4 and to run the new system with upgraded software that is based on the experience we have been gathering in our NORA [Not Only Radar] technology demonstrator programme over the past few years."

One of these demonstrator programmes has focused on SAR/GMTI techniques, using a PS-05/A derivative flown in a container in the back of a SwAF C-130H Hercules. "Results have included geo-positioning of targets and geo-coding of SAR images," Branzell said.

The other demonstrator has concentrated on long-range detection and tracking of air targets in support of the future MBDA Meteor missile, he said. For this set-up, Ericsson Microwave Systems has been using an AESA antenna assembly that the Swedish company has acquired from Raytheon. The trials array comprises approximately 1,000 transmit/receive modules, Branzell said.

The Raytheon-supplied AESA was placed in front of a monopulse radar configuration, the combination being capable of beam agility and flexible beam forming, Branzell said. "We have used both wide beams and narrow beams, the latter for long-range detection and tracking. The SwAF has supported these trials by providing a bunch of Gripens to test the radar's multi-target tracking capabilities."

Further into the future (2015), the company envisions replacing the Mk 4's back-end with a new NORA radar system. This would be a full, multi-channel AESA system, of which the array can be subdivided into multiple sub-apertures capable of adaptive beam forming for jamming suppression and digital beam forming of multiple beams for multi-tasking.

"NORA has to be a multifunctional sensor," Branzell said. "Tactical requirements for it include ensuring dominant battlespace awareness; air target tracking and fire-control for BVR weapons; all-weather precision ground target capability; track identification through non-co-operative target recognition [NCTR]; low probability of intercept [LPI] through a low radar cross section and flexible energy management; and electronic warfare inclusive of offensive jamming."

By 2018, the next step would be to evolve the NORA sensor into a multifunction sensor that will combine active and passive radar, communications, electronic warfare and jamming. This future all-in-one sensor is currently known as EIRA for Ericsson Integrated RF Avionics - a designation that is likely to change however with the pending incorporation of the Gothenburg-based radar house into the Saab Group.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 09 Jun 2009, 14:56 
Offline

Joined: 25 Apr 2009, 20:03
Posts: 126
It seems that the Gripen has combat history; its first kills.

Quote:
The Norrbotten wing of the Swedish air force has agreed to pay Bohmans Hönseri AB the sum of 6,100 kronor ($775) to compensate for the loss of the hens.

The hens were crushed to death in a panicked mêlée when the Jas Gripen fighter aircraft flew at an altitude of 50-100 metres above their coop at the farm in Jörn near Skellefteå in the far north of Sweden.

Farmer Åsa Karlsson, in her complaint to the armed forces, confirmed that the hens were scared out of their wits by the roar of the low flying fighter jets overhead. The brood ran towards a wall of their enclosure and 31 birds fell victim in the surge.

The sum was agreed between the parties based on a calculation that the hens had a further seven weeks to live and would have been expected to produce a harvest of 14 eggs per week.


Source Air force compensates farmer for hen massacre


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 09 Jun 2009, 15:44 
Offline

Joined: 19 Oct 2005, 12:39
Posts: 1372
Location: United Kingdom
Skyhawk the enemy will not always come fight at altitude, especially if that is your aircrafts strong point. What if he sticks to a very low altitude were his aircraft is better than yours.

In simulated AC fighter pilots found to their horror that when tangling with the sub sonic A-10 Warthog that it could turn inside them. They then found themselves facing a 30mm gatling gun with a very high rate of fire and meant to kill tanks with depleted urainuim ammo. One hit and your plane will be toast, plus the aircraft had been designed to take extreme amounts of punishment. Cockpit area armoured for 23mm hits.

Still flies on one engine and a hit on one engine does not damage the other, one tail plane gone so what, portion of wing etc


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 09 Jun 2009, 16:12 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2009, 11:40
Posts: 1057
Location: Waterfalls , Harare south
i beg to differ wolfman. you are right most weather occurs at 36 000 ft thats why passenger jets are no longer troubled by weather like they used to but the possibility of weather occuring at higher tha 36 is not as little as you might think. weather maps before af447 crashed suggested there was huge activity at more than 50000 ft. also the higher you go the more SAMs will find it harder to hit you. have you heard the case of an asian airforce which flew above an enemy country at very high altitude and all they could do was watch

_________________
I have always believed if done right , armed robbery doesn't have to be a totally unpleasant experience- Brad Pitt as J.D in Thelma and Louise


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 09 Jun 2009, 16:45 
Offline

Joined: 25 Apr 2009, 20:03
Posts: 126
skyhawk77 wrote:
i beg to differ wolfman. you are right most weather occurs at 36 000 ft thats why passenger jets are no longer troubled by weather like they used to but the possibility of weather occuring at higher tha 36 is not as little as you might think. weather maps before af447 crashed suggested there was huge activity at more than 50000 ft.


Could you possibly provide a liable source to prove me wrong, my source The encyclopedia of earth and my meteorology books that I had to study to become a pilot says the same thing I said.

skyhawk77 wrote:
also the higher you go the more SAMs will find it harder to hit you. have you heard the case of an asian airforce which flew above an enemy country at very high altitude and all they could do was watch


The latest generation and a few previous generation SAM's can shoot down an aircraft from 100m to 18 km so both aircraft are unsafe.

Source: SA-10/SA-20


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 09 Jun 2009, 19:08 
Offline

Joined: 01 Jul 2008, 09:56
Posts: 91
The SA-2 Guideline which was deployed in 1957 can reach 66 000ft
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SA-2

So flying high in dense air defense area is not the best decision.
regards


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 9  Next

All times are UTC + 2 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 119 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group