The SAAF Forum

Discussion on the SAAF and other southern African air forces.
It is currently 19 Jun 2013, 19:25

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » The Forum » General Chatter

All times are UTC + 2 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 7 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Roger the Dodger
 Post subject: New article on Wikipedia
PostPosted: 16 Jun 2012, 15:23 
Offline

Joined: 07 Apr 2008, 11:50
Posts: 2411
I have just written a little article on Wikipedia about the Umbani glide bomb.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denel_Dynamics_Umbani
I'd like to know what you guys and gals think of it before other Wikipedia editors rip it to shreds!
Top
 Profile  
 
CheetahSupporter
PostPosted: 17 Jun 2012, 00:02 
Offline

Joined: 15 Feb 2010, 02:11
Posts: 358
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Useful, probably more or less correct! You know more about this than I do.

But please change the reference title "DefenceWeb - Umbani becomes first SA weapon trailed off Hawk" to "DefenceWeb - Umbani becomes first SA weapon trialled off Hawk". Yes, I know, DefenceWeb got it wrong first.
Top
 Profile  
 
Roger the Dodger
PostPosted: 17 Jun 2012, 08:37 
Offline

Joined: 07 Apr 2008, 11:50
Posts: 2411
DefenceWeb will have to fix it first, because citations on Wikipedia must follow the source exactly.
I can tag it with (sic) but that just draws attention to the mistake.
Top
 Profile  
 
Kremlin
PostPosted: 17 Jun 2012, 14:22 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2007, 16:57
Posts: 4107
Location: ILS RWY19, FACT
Great work Roger :smt023

_________________
Brent Best
Top
 Profile  
 
jeffreynic
PostPosted: 17 Jun 2012, 15:43 
Offline

Joined: 08 Mar 2009, 05:05
Posts: 1201
Location: Cow town area, Alberta
Nice. :smt023
How about a picture or two?
Top
 Profile  
 
Roger the Dodger
PostPosted: 17 Jun 2012, 19:07 
Offline

Joined: 07 Apr 2008, 11:50
Posts: 2411
jeffreynic wrote:
Nice. :smt023
How about a picture or two?


Kremlin has very kindly sent me a few pics - I'll get one into the article as soon as I've figured out the legalities and technicalities.
Top
 Profile  
 
CheetahSupporter
PostPosted: 18 Jun 2012, 11:13 
Offline

Joined: 15 Feb 2010, 02:11
Posts: 358
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Roger the Dodger wrote:
DefenceWeb will have to fix it first, because citations on Wikipedia must follow the source exactly.
I can tag it with (sic) but that just draws attention to the mistake.
Sounds logical.

I'd say tag it with (sic) in order to draw attention to a correction which is needed! People do say I'm overly-critical at times, though.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 7 posts ] 

Board index » The Forum » General Chatter

All times are UTC + 2 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group