The SAAF Forum

Discussion on the SAAF and other southern African air forces.
It is currently 19 Apr 2024, 21:32

All times are UTC + 2 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 201 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 15 Jun 2009, 11:40 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2004, 17:19
Posts: 8397
skyhawk77 wrote:
sorry i copied your diagrams before i read the instruction which clearly states that they are to be used in a book and are not to be copied. i m sorry i posted them on other forums like this one and i received lots of praises like you received.


Which forum was that?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 15 Jun 2009, 13:34 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2009, 11:40
Posts: 1057
Location: Waterfalls , Harare south
pakistani defence
sino defence .etc

_________________
I have always believed if done right , armed robbery doesn't have to be a totally unpleasant experience- Brad Pitt as J.D in Thelma and Louise


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 15 Jun 2009, 13:42 
Offline

Joined: 19 Oct 2005, 12:39
Posts: 1372
Location: United Kingdom
Easy solution Skyhawk.

Go back to those forums delete the diagrams and explain why they have been deleted.

As what you have done is the reason why people do not up load alot of their work.

This is the reason why I stopped uploading pictures of some of my very rare SAAF badges.

I do not mind people using them, but not when I found chaps claiming the photos or items actually belonged to them or I had asked for them not to be used else where.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 15 Jun 2009, 16:15 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2004, 17:19
Posts: 8397
Yup, that's why I first wanted to know which forums it was.

Skyhawk, please go back and delete your posts and confirm to me that it has been deleted.

I take copyright infringment quite seriously and while I appreciate that you did bring it to our attention, I do not want to chase Robban or anyone else away because of this.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 15 Jun 2009, 18:12 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2009, 11:40
Posts: 1057
Location: Waterfalls , Harare south
just playing with you guys i never posted anything you can check. i swear. i would never do that.

_________________
I have always believed if done right , armed robbery doesn't have to be a totally unpleasant experience- Brad Pitt as J.D in Thelma and Louise


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 15 Jun 2009, 18:18 
Offline

Joined: 19 Oct 2005, 12:39
Posts: 1372
Location: United Kingdom
Now you have really earned the title of Umfaan :lol:

This is an adult forum not Tante Betties Kindergarden's sandpit :wink:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 15 Jun 2009, 18:28 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2004, 17:19
Posts: 8397
skyhawk77 wrote:
just playing with you guys i never posted anything you can check. i swear. i would never do that.


Carefull [-X

I like to think we are a serious forum, there are other forums for jokes, but not many for serious discussion and research.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 22 Jun 2009, 08:44 
Offline

Joined: 22 Jun 2009, 08:32
Posts: 4
i would like to support JF17. i feel JF17 is evolving at a surprising speed. The latest model always contains cutting-edge technology. basically, JF17 is a small version of J10, which has evolved to version B, combining newly designed BUMP. According to some sources from pakistan forum, JF17 even equips more advanced radar and link system than j10. not for sure, but j10b seems like a great fighter.

Image

this pic above is jf17

Image

this is j10b on test.

I hope that gripen could proceed at a higher speed.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 22 Jun 2009, 10:08 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 03 May 2005, 08:40
Posts: 3457
Location: Whangarei, New Zealand
What on earth is that object lying in front of the aircraft on the ground? Looks almost as if it could be a Sunday ham! :lol:

_________________
A plan is simply a basis for change.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 22 Jun 2009, 18:20 
Offline

Joined: 25 Apr 2009, 20:03
Posts: 126
H1017412 wrote:
What on earth is that object lying in front of the aircraft on the ground? Looks almost as if it could be a Sunday ham! :lol:


It's Chinese Salami =P~

Quote:
New features on the J-10B or FC-20 as known in Pakistan include a re-designed, divertor-less supersonic intake, infra-red search and track sensor, extra underwing hardpoint, wide-angle holographic head-up display, modified nose section (for a phased array radar) and enlarged tail fin (with tip mounted electronic warfare sensor).


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 22 Jun 2009, 23:08 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 09 Feb 2008, 16:47
Posts: 1239
Location: Somerset West, South Africa
The J10B looks like a Gripen x F-16 x Something else :roll:

_________________
[Sardine]
My Photos: http://www.airplane-pictures.net/member ... .php?p=882
Blog: http://the-flying-fish.blogspot.com/, UPDATED on 13 August 2013


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 23 Jun 2009, 06:44 
Offline

Joined: 22 Jun 2009, 08:32
Posts: 4
H1017412 wrote:
What on earth is that object lying in front of the aircraft on the ground? Looks almost as if it could be a Sunday ham! :lol:

it should be a packed deceleration parachute.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 23 Jun 2009, 06:57 
Offline

Joined: 22 Jun 2009, 08:32
Posts: 4
the latest version of JF17
Image

it is believed that it will use Chinese-made engine called "ws-13" in the future. the exported jf17 will not use Russia engine in order to avoid trade barrier set by Russia. ws-13 is believed to be a improved copy of Russia RD93, combined with Chinese and the Western technology.


Last edited by eyesonme on 23 Jun 2009, 21:11, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 23 Jun 2009, 15:52 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 23 Jul 2004, 15:11
Posts: 961
Location: Centurion, RSA
Hi
I see some people are confusing the JF17 and the J10. The one utilize two RD33's and the other (J10) using the same enjine as on the SU30MK (One off). I s that correct?
I have to say: The J10 looks realy cool....

_________________
Da-di-da-da-da


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 23 Jun 2009, 16:42 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 02 Jun 2006, 20:05
Posts: 453
Location: 44.634171°, -93.129741°
boertjie wrote:
Hi
I see some people are confusing the JF17 and the J10. The one utilize two RD33's and the other (J10) using the same enjine as on the SU30MK (One off). I s that correct?
I have to say: The J10 looks realy cool....


The JF-17 uses a single modified RD-33 (i.e. from Mig-29) and renamed RD-93. The Chinese are testing/certifying their own version, the WS-13 with 10% more power.

The J-10 uses a single AL-31F type (from Su-27 family) engine. The Chinese are also testing their own copy of the engine, the WS-10.

Both J-10 and FC-1 (JF-17) are single engined.

A quick read: http://cnair.top81.cn/J-10_J-11_FC-1.htm

_________________
In God I trust, everyone else bring your data!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 201 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC + 2 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group